2 comments on “An absolutely astounding Chinese historical record from 31AD — O.O

    • This is true. However, I noted that some researchers feel that 33 is the true date, rather than 31. I, personally, do not know if either of them is accurate, but I feel all info should be presented. If you find some data, please pass it on.

      Perhaps it’d be good to visit IAMTAT’s thread on ATS for more.

      I do think the discrepancy is pretty interesting.

What then, do thee, in thy mind, have?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.