9/11 Shanksville Eyewitness Susan McElwain
Terrorcell2
Aug 28, 2007This uncut interview footage with Shanksville Eyewitness Susan McElwain debunks the Official Story and exposes The Histroy Channel’s heavy editing of her eyewitness account.
THIS is what actually crashed.
Please look at this old post, 9/11 — The Story — The Guilty, and see how much truth YouTube has purged from the record. This one video seems to be all that is left.
Oh, wait, this one is still there:
flight 93 did not crash in shanksville
Oct 14, 2013
It landed in Cleveland. The mayor even said so. Scrubbed story…
And this from the same youtuber
fight 93
douglas bickford
Oct 14, 2013
I misspoke a little. There is some stuff still out there, like this group of playlists, www.youtube.com/user/Terrorcell2/playlists, but the one, showing Cleveland, is gone.
UAL Flight 93 Landed Safely At Cleveland Hopkins Airport
Plane Lands In Cleveland – Bomb Feared Aboard
8-7-4
Reported by 9News Staff
Web produced by:Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AMA Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.
White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.
United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did not say how many people were aboard the flight.
United said it was also “deeply concerned” about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.
On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: “The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.
“United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights,” he said.
______
Reply to email commenting on Flight 93 using link
http://www.wcpo.com/specials/2001/americaattacked/news_local/story14.html
No Body Parts Found At Flt 93 Crash Scene
http://www.flight93crash.com/flight93_secondary_debris_field.html#2nd
http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=193
better: http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/print.php?storyid=193
Dulce Decorum
Dulce still points out, that something is odd with the serial numbers of Flight93 and Flight 175.
The serial numbers of the ORIGINAL planes are SAME serial numbers of the planes that ARE STILL FLYING. 591UA and 612UA.Dulce argues, that though N-number can be transferred, the manufacturer serial number CANNOT be transferred.
According to some spot-witnesses, Boeing 757-222 SERIAL NUMBER 28142 is flying around Chicago under the alias 594UA.
According to the FAA, N594UA Boeing 757-222 flies now with a DIFFERENT serial number, namely 28145.
Something is fishy.
Never Forget.