TPTB

You know what?

After all these years… I never noticed this…!

Here’s the usual aerial shot of the Pentagon that we’ve all seen. Check it out. Do you see it?

It will provide you with one of those moments they make memes about.

Okay folks… here it is.

In living color.

All I can say is…

What the actual fµ¢k?!

Well.

There you have it.

Fabulous.

Peace.

 

Something everyone should know!
it affects the Planet, the animals, the humans.
BIG OIL – 5 facts in 10 minutes.
https://www.facebook.com/iammatthewjohn/videos/642082869329123/

I was appalled when I saw the visualizations of the hundreds of accidents. I had no idea. We need to get rid of these people. And quick.

Yes, quicker the better.

These psychos are sickos on every level!

 

part 1

part 2

Frank Zappa Exposing the illuminati

And an extremely wise and prescient job he does of it, too.

The man was a genius in more ways than one, Herbert.

And to cap things off on a humorous note… dig this…

Zappa’s Epic Response

Frank Zappa’s epic response to the tyrannical, repressed, uptight, angry little man that is John Lofton.

For some reason CNN bleeped out “ass.” I guess they had different standards back then.

For the full debate, click the link below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ISil7…

LOL

 

The 9/11 Conspiracy Theory! (in under 5 minutes)

The entire Conspiracy Theory of 9/11 explained in under 5 minutes. Reposted from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLXyB5…

9-11 explained in 5 minutes!!!.mp4

JAMES CORBETT of THE CORBETT REPORT
3:20 is Barry Jennings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRaKH…

9-11 was done by our government, don’t be ignorant. Do some research and listen to educated, trained professionals explain the facts about 9-11. The “experts” that make it on television are paid government employees and therefore incapable of common sense or having an educated opinion on the subject.

http://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-co…
http://actorsandartistsfor911truth.co…

Fabulous.

My dear friend Andy just posted this and I thought it should be on here for you to see as well.

Andrea Ruehrwein Raynor shared AJ+’s video.
“Truth, humor, and horror”

AJ+ with Francesca Fiorentini.
Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 3:39pm

Trump’s been compared to Andrew Jackson, a president infamous for brutality against Native Americans.

And that’s not good for Standing Rock.

This is pretty sad, but then the truth usually causes that sort of feeling.

For the safety of every one of us, I am grateful for how things turned out, as, we definiteley dodged a bullet.

However, they were both funded by the same old crew of global slime, so, we must be as vigilant as ever.

Selected, same result no matter who… all that applies.

But this shit for frigging oil is bullshit.

Sigh.

Okay now, listen up good, this is of extreme importance…

Haitian Politician UNLOADS on Corrupt Clinton Foundation for Doing NOTHING for Haiti – 10/12/16

TheDailyTrump
TheDailyTrump
Published on Oct 12, 2016

###

I found this on ATS this morning in a thread by gmoneystunt, Member, called A Warning to the People of the U.S. from Former Haitian Senate President Watch Out For Hillary.

I just read the quotes below and knew right then that I had to let my folks here know. I am even more appalled than before, which, quite frankly, I didn’t even think possible. But there it is.

Here we go:

Oct 13, 2016 – A Warning to the People of the United States from Bernard Sansaricq interviewed by Sandy Rios on American Family Radio
The warning is at about 8:40 in the above radio link

Former Haitian Senate President Calls Clintons ‘Common Thieves Who Should Be in Jail’

Sansaricq said that the Clinton Foundation received 14.3 billion dollars in donation money to help with the relief effort. President Obama and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon put the Clinton Foundation in charge of the reconstruction, but Haiti has seen no help. The money all went to friends of Bill Clinton.

It is now known, thanks to WikiLeaks, that the State Department colluded with the Clinton Foundation to make sure that those multi-million dollar contracts would literally go to “friends of Bill.”

Email exchanges show Clinton Foundation officials in the hours after the massive earthquake reaching out to a senior aide to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who “repeatedly gave special attention to those identified by the abbreviations ‘FOB’ (friends of Bill Clinton) or ‘WJC VIPs’ (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs).”


Sansaricq pointed out that some of the 14.3 billion dollars the Clinton Foundation was given to rebuild the country after the 2010 earthquake could have been put toward building hurricane-proof infrastructure. But the Clintons only enriched themselves and did nothing to help the victims — and now the body count for Hurricane Matthew has gone up to over 1,000 people and millions of homes have been destroyed.

He said that Bill Clinton became a power broker in Haiti in 1994 when he invaded Haiti to restore democracy. “He wanted to have power in Haiti even after his presidency,” Sansaricq said.

nevo.news…

‘FOBs’: How Hillary’s State Dept. Gave Special Attention to ‘Friends of Bill’ After Haiti Quake

Now, we’re discovering that Hillary Clinton has not only stolen money from the people of Haiti but also STIFFED the contractors.

hn5813281e

From:aj66@nyu.edu
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2011-11-30 14:41
Subject: outstanding issue

John – one thing to raise with Laura when you think the timing is right is
the outstanding expenses bill the CF/ CBHF has with McKinsey. My friend
Eric was the partner who led the work McKinsey did pro bono + expenses for
the CF/ CBHF and the IHRC in Haiti for more than a year and their expenses
have not yet been paid
. Eric did not want to reach out to me but after
Laura hung up on him last week – after not responding to any of the formal
bills or formal emails or Eric’s emails – I think he’s a bit at wits end
and also doesn’t want to run it up the flag pole at McKinsey to attract any
undesired attention. I have not raised with my father yet as I thought you
or Bruce were a more appropriate vehicle though I am happy to raise if you
think helpful.

Thanks,
Chelsea

truthfeed.com…

The family radio link at the top IMO is worth the 15 mins of your time along with the 4 min video.

He gave the warning but will America listen? Thoughts?

To which Kalixi, Member, replied:

The Clinton Foundation makes Monsanto look like The Starlight Foundation.

Indeed.

I am actually kind of scared for the future.

Do you REALLY want these people controlling your lives and sending your kids to war?

I most certainly hope not!

Peace

We hope.

 

This is rather excellent.

PentaProps™ to Jeff Jamroga of the Jamrogas for this post.

The schools – like everything else here – is geared not towards learning to live a life of discovery but rather towards an end goal of producing corporate profit. At the expense of all else, of course.

It is a crime against humanity of epic proportions.

It needs to be scrapped and redone so it benefits the people it professes to teach. Like it says, students may be 20% of the population but they are 100% of the future.

Get it?

Peace

Save the Horses!
This BLM is BS.
Bastards Killing Horses.
This is what America has become.
Revolting.

Saving America’s Horses

September 11 at 6:46pm ·

UPDATE: Fate of 44,000 Wild Horses remains under Threat of EXTERMINATION pending BLM decision TBA spring 2017. Meanwhile status quo BLM practices leave horses with no real protection from killing or slaughter.

On Sept 9, 2016 the BLM (Bureau of Land Management), Advisory Board voted to recommend EXTERMINATING over 44,000 innocent wild American Mustangs who have been brutally rounded up and are currently held wrongly under encampment
We must STAND TOGETHER & TAKE ACTION to STOP this looming Genocidal Atrocity Before it’s too late.
How to help:
STAND WITH US – Click to JOIN:http://www.savingamericashorses.org/join_comestandwithus.ht…
Download App on your PHONE: http://apps.appmakr.com/standwithus
SIGN THIS PETITION:
https://goo.gl/icL6Sc
SHARE this post
Invite your friends to this page
WE ARE THEIR VOICE, AND THEY MUST BE HEARD!

Indeed.


The Free Thought Project Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:15pm

This was AMAZING!

H/t: EndTheFed.org
Join Us: The Free Thought Project

Like this’ll go anywhere.

It should of course. The hurt they’ve caused is uncountable.

Something really awful should be thought up for their fate — come the revolution.

Like that’ll happen, too.

Sigh.

Peace.

 

Used & Betrayed – 100 Years of US Troops as Lab Rats // Empire_File026

Empire Files Published on May 24, 2016

On Memorial Day, politicians will speak at ceremonies all over the country and repeat their favorite mantra: “Support the troops.”

This pledge is hammered into the American psyche at every turn. But there is a hidden, dark history that shows that the politicians are in fact no friend to service members–but their greatest enemy.

An easy way to prove this truth is to look at how they so quickly betray and abandon their soldiers after purposely ruining their lives, and even after using them as literal lab rats.

In this disturbing chapter of The Empire Files, Abby Martin documents decades of experimentation on US troops—from nuclear tests to psychotropic drugs—as well as knowingly exposing them to deadly poisons, from sarin gas to Agent Orange.

Most damning is that the hundreds of thousands of veterans seeking help from the government for the side-effects are always met with lies and denial.

FOLLOW // @EmpireFiles // @AbbyMartin // @telesurenglish

LIKE // https://www.facebook.com/TheEmpireFiles

Episode music by Anahedron
Intro music by Fluorescent Grey

Wow.

To such an incredible depth of depravity they go. Evil depravity. Psychopathic greed sort of thing.

The military-industrial complex wil not be denied any opportunity to gain a new advance in killing. That complex includes Big Pharma, of course.Ever loyal to the agenda of perpetual war, with nary a thought that using our own kids as lab rats might be wrong.To the psychopath there is no wrong. Only what will or will not further the agenda.

Soldiers are G.I., after all, and that stands for Government Issue. In effect, the soldier is a number, a property to be used as desired or disposed of as needed. Like a table.

Disgusting.

And Standard Operating Procedure.

Which is even more disgusting.

I do know as well that these evil talents are mustered and used against people in other lands, such as the Gates-funded Zika mosquitoes and others no doubt much worse.

Although the video discusses our US government it should be noted by everyone that pretty much all of the “civilized” governments do just this sort of thing.

It boggles the mind and makes faith in humanity pretty tenuous.

These people need to be toppled and quick.

Seriously.

It is very good to see Anonymous get on the bandwagon against Satan’s Mistress.

I learned of this happening via a thread on ATS, as is the norm in this HQ. In it, member Sublimecraft writes, in part:

SOURCE
Article

I have just come across this release and am working my way through the pages and pages of links to articles and videos showing the Clintons (and others) in action. Both her and Slick Willys shenanigans over the years are well documented on ATS and now it appears we have a veritable treasure trove of information all in the one single location – and as indicated in the message, both establishment US political parties are targeted in this dump…

Anyway, in this regard I am merely the messenger, the information is at hand so feel free to explore, research and as always, draw your own conclusions – you’ll likely find they differ greatly to what the MSM portrays.

Hillary Clinton:

Greetings, We are Anonymous This is an Open Message to You Hillary Clinton,
We Know What You and Your People Stand For and We Do Not Forget,
It Seems Lying has Become a Second Nature to You.. Should we Say your only Nature
and Many Blindly Support You, but we know your real Motives, your Real Plans,
You Will Not Bring About Change, At least not in a Positive Way, and you will remain a puppet like
all those before you..
Remember the 30,000 Emails You Deleted, Remember the Shady Weapons Deals that Helped Arm Isis?
Remember you telling your aides to Delete Classification Tags?
Remember the Jokes about “Wiping” your server?
Remember All your lies? Hillary, there is a reason that they say to tell the truth the first time
around so you don’t have to remember your lies.. they add up, your behavior and your actions they all add up..

Oh but Hillary, you will learn today why Anonymous doesn’t forget and how we took the liberty
to Archive All of your corruption, your lies, shady deals, and even family history..
We even went as far to include your past scandals, we told you back in January we were going to
dig up all of your closet skeletons and We Weren’t Lying.. Included Below is All of Your History..
We Even Included the Clinton Body Count Because Frankly, We Feel 80 Dead People Around One Family Name
is Suspicious Especially When Lawyers, and your Associates are Included in Such a List with Suspicious Deaths Surrounding
investigations and When Women like Kathleen Willey and Others Have Come Forward Saying they were Threatened by your henchman..

But What Really Did it for Us Was the Blatant Display of Electioneering by YOU and YOUR Husband Slick Willy..
so we Also Compiled a List of All the Election Rigging We’ve Been Seeing.. but We didn’t Only Include the DNC Oh No,
We Are Fed Up with the Bull #, our voice and vote is being suppressed and where as we take no Political Affiliation
Here and just Seek to See you Destroyed We can Not Ignore Super Delegates and Delegates Ruining Democracy..

its Over, Hillary your Presidential Run Ends Here and Your Prison Run Starts Now.. We Demand the FBI
Indicts and Imprisons this Career Criminal.. The Evidence, provided Below Should Be Enough, You Are Welcome We DID
your Research.. In the Next Couple Weeks, We Will Be Campaigning with a Fax Bomb Campaign For
Everyone to Call their Senators, and Congressman to Demand a Special Council is Put together to Prosecute Hillary
Clinton.. Because We Know the DOJ and Loretta Lynch Will Not Do Their Job Against their Own..

We Do Not Forgive,
We Do Not Forget,
You Should’ve Expected Us..

will update when we see fit..

Without Further Ado We Present, the Clinton Show..:

Anonymous – Message to Hillary Clinton
JOIN US: https://www.facebook.com/AnonymousDirect
– Connect with Anonymous –
Subscribe ● http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…
Anonymous Google+ ● https://google.com/+AnonymousWorldvoce
Anonymous Facebook ● http://facebook.com/anonymousdirect
Anonymous Twitter ● http://twitter.com/anonymousOfcl
Anonymous T-Shirts ● http://anonymousofficial.spreadshirt.com
Anonymous Website ● http://anonofficial.com
Anonymous Mask (Modern) ● http://amzn.to/1U9q8oI
Anonymous Mask (White) ● http://amzn.to/1TrNree
Anonymous Mask (Black & Gold) ● http://amzn.to/1U9qc83

Message to Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton Email Archive:
https://goo.gl/5BFBQf

Original Video Credit:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChLf…

We are anonymous.
We are legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.

– Watch some of our other videos –

Anonymous Documentary – How Anonymous Hackers Changed the World Full Documentary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAECy…

Anonymous – The Hacker Wars Full Documentary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku9ed…

Anonymous Documentary – The Story of the Anonymous Hacktivists Full Documentary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bC1ex…

Anonymous – Behind The Mask:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WNwR…

Anonymous – Plan to defeat the Illuminati and New World Order:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kobrw…

Anonymous – The Story of Aaron Swartz Full Documentary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpvcc…

……….

There is no copyright infringement intended for the video and/or material used in this video. If you have an issue with Anonymous Official posting this, please contact us at “anonymous@anonofficial.com” and we can sort it out. COPYRIGHT RELATED ISSUES ONLY PLEASE.

‘Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for ‘fair use’ for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use’

I wonder if it will help. I often think that the group is much more in a “preaching to the choir” situation than anything else. I don’t think most of mainstream America is even aware that Anonymous exists, let alone is prepared to cast a yay or nay vote on their message.

Yes, I wonder.

But at least the two or maybe three people who visit this site will see…so, HEY!

Oh dear.

But one thing I have always been bothered about Anonymous is their lack of bite. In this episode, wonderful as it is that they are going after the monster, they haven’t released anything new, anything that hasn’t been discussed before. No powerful punch-packing smoking guns of solid proof. So, besides waking up a few folks, which is great, don’t get me wrong, this will not damage the demon in any significant way. The FBI can do it, but we all know they won’t.

Sigh.

I pray to God every day that she doesn’t get in. I hope we win.

I would rather see Trump as main puppet than this Spawn of Hell.

Peace.

Visit this link at Amnesty International to go to the page to download this as a pdf in your language.

amnestyAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
PUBLIC STATEMENT
Index: MDE 15/3824/2016
12 April 2016

Israeli Government must cease intimidation of human rights defenders,
protect them from attacks

The Israeli authorities must end their long-standing attacks on Palestinian human rights
defenders (HRDs) and halt the climate of intimidation of HRDs in Israel and the Occupied
Palestinian Territories (OPT), Amnesty International said today. Israeli authorities must
take immediate steps to provide protection necessary for HRDs in Israel/OPT to carry out
their work freely and without fear of attacks and harassment. Attacks and threats against
HRDs must be investigated and those responsible must be held to account.

An escalation of acts of intimidation by the government and attacks and threats by settlers
and other non-state actors have created an increasingly dangerous environment for HRDs
in Israel and in the OPT. Israel is routinely violating Palestinians’ rights to freedom of
expression and freedom of association in the OPT and are targeting HRDs, including by
arbitrary arrest and detention, imprisonment, injury and torture. Israel authorities also are
failing to protect HRDs from attacks by Israeli settlers and other extreme right wing
activists, and in some cases they have been complicit in such attacks. Israel has also
taken steps to curtail freedom of expression inside Israel with officials using intimidation
to target HRDs. Recent legislative initiatives that are apparently aimed at constricting
freedom of expression have gone hand in hand with an ever-darkening public mood against
those who criticise the Israeli government, and have increasingly come to affect Jewish
Israeli critics of the Israeli government and its practices.

Israeli Government intimidation of Omar Barghouti

Amnesty International is concerned for the safety and liberty of Palestinian human rights
defender Omar Barghouti, and other Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) activists,
following calls alluding to threats, including of physical harm and deprivation of basic
rights, made by Israeli ministers at an anti-Boycott Divestment and Sanction conference in
Jerusalem on 28 March 2016. Omar Barghouti is a founding member and a prominent
spokesperson of the BDS movement. He campaigns to hold Israel accountable for human
rights and other international law violations and advocates for the use of non-violent
means in doing so. He was personally attacked in comments and statements by
conference participants including ministers, including by describing him as a threat who
should be stopped.

An especially alarming statement came from Israeli Minister of Transport, Intelligence and
Atomic Energy Yisrael Katz who called on Israel to engage in “targeted civil eliminations”
of BDS leaders with the help of Israeli intelligence. The term alludes to “targeted
2 assassinations” which is used to describe Israel’s policy of targeting members of
Palestinian armed groups. Other ministers including Gilad Erdan the Minister of Public
Security, Strategic Affairs and Minister of Information described BDS activists and
leaders as threats and called for them to “pay the price” for their work following this with
a clarification that he does not mean “physical harm”. Omar Barghouti was attacked by
Ariah Deri, the Minister of Interior, who said he is considering revoking Omar Barghouti’s
permanent residency in Israel and depriving him from the right to travel freely. Omar
Barghouti has told Amnesty International that he is gravely concerned about his safety and
that of his family.

Government ministers and other government officials have a particular responsibility to
consider carefully the adverse consequences that can arise from portraying human rights
defenders as security threats for carrying out their peaceful and legitimate work. Such
public statements will have strong and dangerous resonance in Israel/OPT, particularly
given the increasingly perilous environment in which human rights defenders there are
working, under constant threats and attacks by the state and by settlers and other extreme
right wing activists.

This is not the first time that Omar Barghouti has faced threats and intimidation, but
these statements have been the most serious to have come from government officials.
Ministers have a responsibility to uphold human rights and should avoid making
inflammatory public remarks against Omar Barghouti and other HRDs. And they should
withdraw threat to arbitrarily restrict his freedom of movement and cancel his permanent
residency In Israel.

Death threats against Imad Abu Shamsiyeh

On 24 February 2016 Imad Abu Shamsiyeh, a Palestinian resident of Tel Rumeida,
Hebron, filmed the apparent extrajudicial execution of Abed al-Fatah al-Sharif by an
Israeli soldier. The footage was released by the Israeli human rights organization B’tselem
and led to the arrest of the soldier, who remains under investigation. Since the publication
of the footage, B’tselem has reported that Imad Abu Shamsiyeh has been subjected to
death threats made by Israelis living in the nearby illegal settlements and through phone
calls and messages. Stones were also thrown at his house by Israeli settlers. He has
previously been attacked on numerous occasions by Israeli settlers who live nearby and in
retaliation for documenting abuses. The Palestine News Network also reported that Imad
Abu Shamsiyeh’s home was raided by Israeli soldiers on the night of 29 March, ostensibly
to check the identities of local and international HRDs who were staying with him in the
wake of threats. The Israeli authorities must immediately bring to justice those who have
threatened and attacked Nidal Abu Shamsiyeh and protect him from any further attacks.

Death threats against al-Haq staff

Al-Haq is one of the most prominent and respected of Palestinian human rights NGOs. In
recent months, it has been the target – along with other Palestinian NGOs – of a sustained
campaign attempting to undermine its work through the use of anonymous phone calls
and emails. In February and March 2016, a staff member of Al-Haq and its director were
subjected to a number of death threats. These are directly connected to the organization’s
3 work with the International Criminal Court in The Hague. The right of organizations to work
with the International Criminal Court and promote accountability must be respected, and
the relevant authorities must investigate and bring to justice those who have issued these
egregious threats.

Arrest and imprisonment of Issa Amro and Farid al-Atrash

Israeli authorities arbitrarily arrested Palestinian human rights defenders Issa Amro and
Farid al-Atrash following a peaceful demonstration in Hebron on 26 February 2016 calling
for lifting of discriminatory restrictions in their city. Both were charged by a military court
and later released. Amnesty International believes both were arrested and charged solely
for exercising their rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and free expression.

Palestinian residents and activists in the city of Hebron, in the occupied West Bank,
organized a non-violent protest march on 26 February 2016 to mark 22 years since the
Israeli authorities first closed al-Shuhada Street in the Old City and to call for the removal
of discriminatory restrictions. Israeli forces met the demonstration with excessive force
and threw sound grenades at the crowd and fired tear gas. Lawyer Farid al-Atrash along
with a photo journalist were arrested. While the journalist was released some hours later
al-Atrash was presented to a military court in Ofer military base near Ramallah and
charged with participating in an illegal demonstration and attacking officers. Video footage
of the arrest shows Farid at-Atrash standing peacefully in front of soldiers when he was
pushed and dragged and then violently arrested by a number of Israeli soldiers. He was
released on bail on Tuesday 1 March 2016 and awaits a date for his first court hearing to
be confirmed.

The Israeli army arrested the activist Issa Amro, whose group Youth Against Settlements
organized the demonstration, on the afternoon of 29 February 2016 from in front of his
house in the city’s Tel Rumeida neighbourhood and charged him in a military court with
organizing an illegal demonstration and incitement. He was released on 1 March 2016
and he is waiting for his trial, the date of which is yet to be confirmed. Amnesty
International believes that both Issa Amro and Farid al-Atrash have been arrested solely for
their peaceful exercise of their rights to freedom of expression and assembly.

Arrest and imprisonment of Khalida Jarrar

Palestinian parliamentarian and HRD Khalida Jarrar was sentenced to 15 months
imprisonment on 6 December 2015 after unfair proceedings before a military court and
during which it appeared that pre-trial detention – including the use of administrative
detention — was being used to punish her and pressure her into accepting a guilty plea.

She finally pleaded guilty to two charges, not believing that she would ever receive a fair
trial, but her lawyers say that the authorities never supported their accusations with
evidence. Amnesty International believes that the detention of Khalida Jarrar, the
proceedings against her and her sentence appear to be punitive measures used to supress
her right to free and peaceful expression.
4
Israeli Government intimidation of Breaking the Silence

Breaking the Silence is an Israeli organization of Israeli soldiers that aims to educate the
Israeli public about Israeli military practices in the OPT, including those which are abusive
or criminal. Since December 2015 it has been subjected to a concerted government
campaign to undermine its work. The Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon banned the
organization from speaking to Israeli soldiers on 14 December. This was followed by a ban
from the Education Minister Naftali Bennett on speaking to high school students that was
enacted on 15 December. Both ministers alleged that the organization spread “lies”
against the army, despite the fact that no evidence of fabrication has ever been found in
any of the testimonies published by the organization.

On 16 December the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in the Knesset that
the organization “tarnishes the image of IDF soldiers around the world, trying to tie Israel’s
hands in its attempts to defend itself.” These statements took place at the same time as a
pro-government NGO released a video declaring that Yuli Novak, the director of the
organization, was a foreign agent who was working to aid “terrorists”. (A number of other
heads of prominent Israeli NGOs also featured in the video.)

On 17 March 2016 an Israeli television program broadcast footage that showed Breaking
the Silence researchers asking questions related to Israeli military deployments and
equipment as part of their interview process. The footage was taken covertly by a settlerrelated
pro-government group. The footage drew harsh condemnation from the Prime
Minister and other government officials. The Defense Minister accused the group of being
“traitors” on 21 March, although he later qualified that statement.

A preliminary Israeli army investigation found that the group had not collected any
information of a secrecy higher than “confidential”, a low level of classification. The group
pointed out that all information published by Breaking the Silence passes through the
military censor before it is published. The seeking of background information about
military equipment, operating practices and deployments is a vital part of analyzing the
conduct of military operations in order to assess their adherence to international
humanitarian and human rights law.

The vicious tone and frequency of invective aimed at Breaking the Silence from top
government officials is completely at odds with their responsibilities, and appears to be
aimed at intimidating the organization and dissuading soldiers from speaking to its staff.
The Israeli government should not portray human rights defenders as security threats for
the work they do. The climate that has been created by government statements appears to
have played a role in the threats and harassment aimed at Breaking the Silence staff and
their family members by individual Israelis. Israeli government officials must immediately
stop their intimidation of Breaking the Silence. They should also recognise the right of
individuals and organizations to investigate allegations of human rights violations and work
to bring violations to light both within Israel and abroad. They should investigate threats
made against and harassment of Breaking the Silence staff and their family members and
bring the individuals responsible to justice.
5
Israeli legislation aimed at curtailing freedom of expression

In recent years, the Israeli authorities have passed a number of laws that restrict the space
for opposition to Israeli government policies and actions. These include laws that deny
government funding to organizations that commemorate the Nakba (catastrophe), the
mass forced displacement of Palestinians that occurred during the founding of Israel in
1948, and that make it a “civil wrong” for any Israeli citizen or institution to call for a
boycott of Israeli institutions or companies in response to Israel’s occupation or illegal
settlements.

There are also a number of pending pieces of legislation that appear to be aimed at
curtailing freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Israeli justice ministry
gave preliminary approval to the “Loyalty in Culture” bill on 24 February, which would give
the government power to retroactively withdraw funding from cultural activities that
“contravene the principles of the state”. The bill is now clear for its first reading in the
Knesset. On 10 February 2016 the Israeli Knesset approved the first reading of the socalled
“NGO Transparency Bill”, which imposes new funding reporting requirements on
organizations that receive more than 50% of their funding from foreign governments. This
would adversely affect most Israeli organizations that scrutinise human rights violations in
Israel and the OPT and/or oppose the occupation.

Israeli rights groups have argued that this is law is unfair and discriminatory, as they are
already required to disclose their sources of funding, and it leaves unaffected the vast
majority of pro-government NGOs, whose funding is mostly from private sources (and on
which there are less pre-existing reporting requirements). Amnesty International is
concerned that the bill appears to be less about transparency and more about a politicallymotivated
stigmatising of organizations that oppose Israeli government policies and
practices. Such a bill appears designed to have a chilling effect on freedom of expression
and association inside Israel. The Israeli government should cease its support for these
bills and make it clear that criticism of it and its policies is an inalienable part of the right
to freedom of expression and that it is legitimate for human rights organizations to seek
funds from abroad for their work.

For more information please call Amnesty International’s press office in London, UK, on
+44 20 7413 5566 or email: press@amnesty.org
International Secretariat, Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW, UK
www.amnesty.org

David Icke Live at the Oxford Union Debating Society

commonlaw007  commonlaw007 Uploaded on Feb 9, 2012

RestrictedData RestrictedDataPublished on Feb 6, 2014.

This silent film shows the final preparation and loading of the “Fat Man” bomb into “Bockscar,” the plane which dropped the bomb on Nagasaki. It then shows the Nagasaki explosion from the window of an observation plane. This footage comes from Los Alamos National Laboratory. I have not edited it in any way from what they gave me except to improve the contrast a little — it is basically “raw.” I have annotated it with some notes on the bombing and what you can see — feel free to disable the annotations if you don’t want them.

More details here, on my blog: http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/0…

Just  business as usual…

Sigh.

Peace

Lancaster_County_Amish_03This is one of the most awful things I have read in a long time.
This goes beyond the iconic “Just Wrong” to a new level of mindset that is simply repulsive to those that I consider to be human beings.
From Wikipedia (I know, sorry.) as is the photo at right:
The Amish (/ˈɑːmɪʃ/; Pennsylvania Dutch: Amisch, German: Amische) are a group of traditionalist Christian church fellowships, closely related to but distinct from Mennonite churches, with whom they share Swiss Anabaptist origins. The Amish are known for simple living, plain dress, and reluctance to adopt many conveniences of modern technology. The history of the Amish church began with a schism in Switzerland within a group of Swiss and Alsatian Anabaptists in 1693 led by Jakob Ammann.[2] Those who followed Ammann became known as Amish.[3]
 Here I go again quoting an entire post (and it’s the owner’s to boot *ducks*) but this is important. Yes, dammit, important — and on more than just the obvious levels.
I do always encourage going to the thread for my readers as the discussion that ensues each topic on many occasions proves just as valuable as the original thought.
It seems so counter-productive to their way of life – or, I perhaps should say, to our perception of the way their life is, never knowing if our thoughts has an actual basis in reality. As you read the article below, this will begin to take on more and more depth.
The trigger in remembering that the thread was open and waiting to be read was hearing on WCBS the other day the headline of the police in the NYC environs asking the public for help in the “heinous crime” of throwing a dog out of a moving car … and while that IS a “heinous crime,” this “heinous crime” is OUT OF CONTROL! And could even be stopped tomorrow if any of the leaders had either spine or> balls.
Here goes: (sorry SO)

The Amish Are Not What They Seem: A Business of Brutal Cruelty

SkepticOverlord ats owner – posted on Jan, 11 2016 @ 12:48 PM link

When we consider the Amish, we often have the image of a quaint and simple people, living a quiet devoutly religious life without the intrusion of modern influences. Often romanticized in movies and TV shows, we’re presented with the visage of gentle people dedicated to an uncomplicated “country” lifestyle. However, as is all propaganda, it couldn’t be further from the truth. Notorious for working horses until they die in the field or can no longer walk from pulling buggies for hours on hard paved roads, the Amish are known for something that directly clashes with their supposed religious beliefs, brutal animal cruelty.

This hidden aspect of Amish immorality has been brought to light recently in Minnesota, where illegally operated puppy mills have been granted new licenses for expanding their operations. That’s right, despite dozens of reports of extremely brutal cruelty toward the dogs, and extensive citations from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Amish puppy mills are expanding in Minnesota. A state where 80,000 to 90,000 unwanted dogs are euthanized each year.

One of the Minnesota puppy mill operators, an Amish man with an extensive record of USDA violations related to illegal dog breeding, has been granted a permit to operate a puppy farm with 85 adult dogs. Dogs that will be kept in cages, with untreated wounds and illnesses, covered in feces and unable to walk will be churning out those puppies you see in pet stores. Speculation on social media is that these “devoutly religious” Amish are bribing corrupt officials in order to get their permits — permits that would normally be denied to operators with their history of violations.

Minnesota is just the tip of an iceberg of brutality. Often illegally operatedAmish puppy mills have been a problem across the Midwest and Northeast for decades. Back in 1993, the New York Times ran a series of stories exposing the illegal and mind boggling brutal Amish operations in Pennsylvania. Puppy mills in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York, and Indiana, most of which are operated by the Amish, refuse to follow state kennel laws and regularly accumulate multiple violations with little or no penalty. In the rare cases where an Amish puppy mill operation is shut down, it’s simply restarted on an Amish neighbor’s property.

Current estimates calculate that these mostly illegal Amish puppy mills are responsible for as much as 70% of the puppies that make it to retail pet stores. Masking the brutal points of origin through puppy auctions, it’s often difficult, if not impossible to trace the point of origin of these troubled dogs back to their brutal beginnings. And indeed they often come with behavioral problems, after being raised in sadistic conditions with little or no human contact outside of the ruthless operators. And all too often, these puppies with behavioral problems are too much for a family to handle, and are given up to shelters and humane societies where euthanasia is likely.

While in the broad scheme of all the world’s problems, these barbaric puppy mills might seem like a small annoyance amongst an overwhelming cacophony of societal problems. But is it really? Is this actually an example of how callous we’ve become; that we would allow these domesticated creatures that can give us so much, to be breed by the hundreds of thousands in such deplorable conditions? The only way to fix society is by one problem at a time, and this seems like an easy problem to fix. And fixing the smaller problems is the path to fixing the bigger ones.

edit on 11-1-2016 by SkepticOverlord because: (no reason given)
It just sends chills up and down my spine knowing thtat there are cultures living amongst us that believe to their core that this is a normal and proper way to be.
And we not questioning  and just accepting the ad without the slightest inkling of wonder is tellimg. Of what I am still trying to wrap my head around. I am thinking it will mot be particularly pleasant.
Augusto PinochetIt brought up the memory of the notoriously awful group of Nazi settlers at the Chilean government-approved Colonia Dignidad. I recommend the article entitled The Torture Colony at The American Scholar, as the author is a survivor of their hand-delivered main product line.
What got me was the remarkable similarity concerning keeping people away whilst thinking naught but wonderfully idyllic thoughts. There seems to be a correlation. In the public presentation, too… the old way of dress and head-turning behavior of an odd but apparently benign nature.
It really is a pity that it just isn’t so.
Anyway, bringing it back to the topic of the Amish and those helpless souls they torture so cruelly… all I can really say in the end is that…

Something needs to be done about it.

They might start with not renewing the God damned licenses!
What a shocker that’d be, huh? Can enough pressure be put on the fat weasels in power over there?
It makes me pray that the revolution comes soon.
Good God.
Peace.

I don’t usually copy ATS Original Posts, but when I do, they’re good ones.

Like this one, member ColdChillin’s very first post and boy is it an excellent one on many levels.

Truth will prevail.

List of ALL Medical Studies Proving Cannabis Cures Cancer

posted on Dec, 14 2015 @ 07:55 PM
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1097023/pg1#pid20151128

After reading numerous posts that have questioned the validity of cannabis in the fight against multiple forms of cancer, I have always wanted to hit back with a reply with included references from REPUTABLE SOURCES that prove that cannabis does in fact cure cancer. Instead, a friend of a friend compiled this list. Rather than pasting it multiple times, I decided that this would be an excellent and positive way to present this information for my very first post on ATS. Should any member need these references to defend your position on cannabis, I highly suggest that you peruse the included links.

Thanks for reading.

Cannabis kills Tumor cells:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis Cures Colorectal Cancer:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis Cures Uterine, Testicular, and Pancreatic Cancers:
www.cancer.gov…

Cannabis-derived substances in cancer therapy and anti-tumour properties:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis Cures Brain Cancer:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.plosone.org…
cancerres.aacrjournals.org…

Cannabis Cures Mouth and Throat Cancer:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis Cures Breast Cancer:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis Cures Lung Cancer:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis Cures Prostate Cancer:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis Cures Blood Cancer:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis Cures Skin Cancer:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis Cures Liver Cancer:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis Cures Cancer in General:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabinoids in intestinal inflammation and cancer: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19442536?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&ordinalpos=22

Cannabis use and cancer of the head and neck: Case-control study: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2277494

Cannabis THC at high doses in area, inhibits cholangiocarcinoma cancer: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19916793?itool=Email.EmailReport.Pubmed_ReportSelector.Pubmed_RVDocSum&ordinalpos=6

Targeting CB2 cannabinoid receptors as a novel therapy to treat malignant lymphoblastic disease
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Marijuana kills cancer cells:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
cancer.gov…

Cannabis Treatment in Leukemia:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabinoids and the immune system:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

Cannabis partially/fully induced cell death in Cancer:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…

NCBI is a search engine for scientific and medical journals. If you open the links you will see that the information comes from many different sources.

edit on 14-12-2015 by ColdChillin because: Included term: reputable sources

I think that the world may become a better place to be. At least in some places.

Cannabis is also known to assist with other human ailments including glaucoma, MS, PTSD, seizures… all sorts of things.

Peace

Lobbyist Claims Monsanto’s Roundup Is Safe To Drink, Freaks Out When Offered A Glass

Panteras Panteralandia Panteras Panteralandia Published on Mar 27, 2015

Update:
Monsanto Knew Glyphosate Cancer Link 35 Years Ago:
https://youtu.be/ghtLClv1nbM

SM Gibson
March 26, 2015
(ANTIMEDIA) French television station Canal+ recently sat down with Dr. Patrick Moore for an upcoming documentary. Dr Moore, who claims to be an ecological expert and is currently the frontman for Ecosense Environmental, stated to the interviewer that Monsanto’s weed killer Roundup was not responsible for skyrocketing cancer rates in Argentina.

This is where the interview took a turn for the surreal.
Dr. Moore insisted that Roundup is safe to drink, at which point the interviewer did the only logical thing one could do in that situation. He offered the doctor a glass of the weed killer to allow him an opportunity to back up his statement. The following is the text from that exchange.
Dr. Patrick Moore: “You can drink a whole quart of (Roundup) and it won’t hurt you.”
Canal+: “You want to drink some? We have some here.”
Moore: “I’d be happy to, actually…. Uhh…Not.. Not really. But I know it wouldn’t hurt me.”
Canal+: “If you say so, I have some glyphosate, have some.”
Moore: “No. I’m not stupid.”
Canal+: “So, it’s dangerous, right?
Moore: “No, People try to commit suicide with it and fail; fail regularly.”
Canal+: “Tell the truth, it’s dangerous.”
Moore: “It’s not dangerous to humans.”
Canal+: “So, are you ready to drink one glass?”
Moore: “No, I’m not an idiot. Interview me about golden rice, that’s what I’m talking about.”
Canal+: “We did.”
Moore then abruptly ends the interview by calling the host a “complete jerk” and storms off.
Greenpeace, an organization to which the doctor turned lobbyist belonged in the 1970’s, issued this statement in part in 2008 regarding Dr. Patrick Moore.
Patrick Moore often misrepresents himself in the media as an environmental “expert” or even an “environmentalist,” while offering anti-environmental opinions on a wide range of issues and taking a distinctly anti-environmental stance. He also exploits long-gone ties with Greenpeace to sell himself as a speaker and pro-corporate spokesperson, usually taking positions that Greenpeace opposes.

While it is true that Patrick Moore was a member of Greenpeace in the 1970s, in 1986 he abruptly turned his back on the very issues he once passionately defended. He claims he “saw the light” but what Moore really saw was an opportunity for financial gain. Since then he has gone from defender of the planet to a paid representative of corporate polluters.

Patrick Moore promotes such anti-environmental positions as clearcut logging, nuclear power, farmed salmon, PVC (vinyl) production, genetically engineered crops, and mining. Clients for his consulting services are a veritable Who’s Who of companies that Greenpeace has exposed for environmental misdeeds, including Monsanto, Weyerhaeuser, and BHP Minerals.
Watch the video from Canal+

Original Video:
http://theantimedia.org/lobbyist-clai…

This article (Lobbyist Claims Monsanto’s Roundup Is Safe To Drink, Freaks Out When Offered A Glass) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org. Tune in to the Anti-Media radio show Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org.

My God in Heaven what a horrible creep! This guy is an ASS… I mean, CLEARLY. He contradicts himself numerous times within the space of a few seconds and doesn’t even seem to realize this fact.

He repeatedly and thoroughly debunks himself.

I think this guy should be in prison in the general population who should be told that he is responsible for tthe deaths of children.

I am so flabbergasted right now.

This freak I don’t even think is a real human being.

Doctor, indeed… doctor of what… Horseshit…!

Sorry for the language… I would just love a few minutes alone with this animal.

Peace.

Sorry.

From today’s email:

Dear Iggy Makarevich,

The blight of the DMCA continues as another round of the anti-circumvention exemptions process comes to a close.

The deck was always stacked against users in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s (DMCA) anti-circumvention exemptions process. The DMCA creates legal penalties for users who circumvent Digital Restrictions Management (DRM), as well as those who share the tools necessary to do so. Every three years activists have the opportunity to ask for exemptions permitting circumvention for particular uses. In the 2015 round of this process, 27 categories of exemptions were proposed, and the FSF commented in favor of granting all 27. We did this because we believe DRM is unjust, and that the DMCA’s anti-circumvention rules compound this injustice and should be repealed. The Library of Congress (LOC) finally published which exemptions we receive in this round, and the outcome for users is another three years of legal penalties hanging over their head should they try to control their own computing.

While there were some notable successes (the Software Freedom Conservancy and Electronic Frontier Foundation each succeeded in gaining some exemptions for users), the LOC failed to grant all of the proposed exemptions, leaving many legitimate and ethical uses trapped in the DMCA’s legal cage. While the LOC granted an exemption permitting users to circumvent DRM on their vehicles, they limited this exemption so that circumventing the entertainment or communications software on a car remains subject to penalty. The exemption was further limited based on feedback from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) calling for the LOC to keep penalties in place on circumventing vehicle DRM in order to try to digitally enforce emissions standards, an issue wholly unrelated to copyright. This is despite the fact that DRM and the DMCA helped Volkswagen hide emissions testing fraud from the EPA, as werecently highlighted.

The EPA wasn’t the only government agency intervening the process trying to co-opt the DMCA to enforce rules unrelated to copyright. The FDA also intervened to restrict user rights when it comes to medical devices. Using DRM to enforce copyright is in no way justified, but that is at least the DMCA’s purported reason for existence. These sorts of non-copyright justifications for the DMCA’s anti-circumvention rules demonstrates that DRM has nothing to do with rights, and everything to do with restriction.

The FSF made a longer statement on the outcome of the process. In that statement we argue that the process and outcome of the current round of exemptions shows why the system doesn’t work. There is no legitimate case for restricting users with DRM. DRM treats everyone as a criminal, and blocks legitimate uses and research that users have every right to enjoy in their devices. The DMCA’s exemption process places the burden on activists to propose narrow exemptions, exemptions that even once granted must be defended against in every continuing round until the end of time. It allows companies and government agencies with greater resources than activists to then intervene to block or repeal even those limited exemptions. And even where exemptions are granted, they do not extend to the sharing of tools which are needed to actually break out of the digital jails DRM creates.

That is why we call on Congress to repeal the DMCA’s anti-circumvention provisions and end this broken process. Users cannot enjoy freedom in their lives so long as legal penalties hang over their head. Join us in the fight to end the broken exemption process and rid the world of DRM.

Here’s what you can do to help:

If you microblog, please share the following message (or your own) with the hashtag #DRMshame. We strongly suggest that if you use Twitter to publicly call the LOC out, you do it in a way that avoids using proprietary software:

  • The DMCA exemption process is broken beyond repair, @librarycongress should have granted all proposed exemptions #DRMshame https://u.fsf.org/1hv

Also, please consider:

Happy hacking,

Donald Robertson
Copyright and Licensing Associate

One of the uploaders of this video (peoplestandup) sent Part 1 to me at my YouTube account, as folks occasionally do. It sounded from the brief description like it would be pretty good. I had heard the name Max Igan but had not seen any of his work, but I kind of knew what to expect.

Turned out it was what I expected… and well put together…the topics include the history of the international banking cartel and their control of the world’s money, governments and people; the history of the War on Terror; false flag operations and the resulting state of endless war and war profiteering; the media; fluoride and the incredibly insidious Codex Alimentarius. In it he calls for the people to take action against the Codex, which dates the film, as it is sadly already law here in the US as it is in most of the world.

It is a sort of low-key version of the message Jordan Maxwell and David Icke and others bring to the table, (thankfully without the far-fetched bits that Icke is famous for) and ends in Part 7 with an elaboration of the very real final point espoused by Gerald Celente on what is truly needed — by all of us, individually — in order for us, as a people, perhaps even as a species, to make it to the other side. There is a seemingly tacked-on Part 8 which consists solely of a New-Agey-but-nice musical piece.

YouTube Video Descriptions from two uploaders:

Uploaded by  on May 10, 2011

http://thecrowhouse.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/aodscarecrow

In March 2009 I was approached to create a combined and summarized version of “The Big Picture”, “Fight the NWO With Global Non Compliance” and “NWO The Final Solution.”

The aim was to condense all 3 films into a one hour solution based production that would appeal to a wider audience and be suitable for television.

This film is the result.

Along with some new material this film contains 2 complete chapters of “The Big Picture – Final Cut” that remain virtually unchanged. This has not been done to ‘recycle’ old material but simply because the information contained within these chapters was relevant and needed to be included.

Should some people you know still remain blind to the urgency of the world situation and to their need to be informed and to act upon such information, it is my sincere hope that this film may help you to open their eyes.
———————-
Resistance Radio
http://www.resistradio.com

Uploaded by peoplestandup on Aug 19, 2010
http://www.peoplestandup.ca
This video “The Calling” was sent to us by a dear friend Max. It is a video that was killed by TV. It was given to us to explain the system and how it works. Do your own homework check out the facts as we did. You will see it is the truth.
We live in an area where elected politicians ignore the needs of their constituents, where the judiciary and police institutions will not uphold the rights of citizens, where the media is afraid to report the truth, where lawlessness abounds and ordinary people are left unprotected and defenceless against the rapacity of a few. The answer to our dilemma is for people of courage to actively help each other. Only if we unite can we succeed. That is the only way. There is no other way. People, stand up!

http://www.peoplestandup.ca
This break down of system made for TV and never was any money made off this film ever! Max Igan did this to try help little guy to show break down of system!
http://www.thecrowhouse.com/home.html

This video was Very well done video Mall the croshouse.com and my reason for uploading this 1 of 8 part video is because this video open up your mind make think about the gig picture that happening all over the world. He intent for Greater Good and want many people to see this some of other work. I know how touch all us here that fighting for simple basic rights to be heard here Nova Scotia Canada.

Max is best film maker I have ever witness to make video with such awareness of break down of system he made a difference and his works awesome thank for make this for common person to understand in simple way!

Watch video and see the truth and go check out for you just keep open mind

The aim was to condense all 3 films into a one hour solution based production that would appeal to a wider audience and be suitable for television.

This film is the result.

Along with some new material this film contains 2 complete chapters of “The Big Picture – Final Cut” that remain virtually unchanged. This has not been done to ‘recycle’ old material but simply because the information contained within these chapters was relevant and needed to be included.

Should some people you know still remain blind to the urgency of the world situation and to their need to be informed and to act upon such information, it is my sincere hope that this film may help!
By http://thecrowhouse.com/

Searching for knowledge in the complex and nerve-wracking area of elder care, (due to my aunt’s imminent immersion into this maelstrom of dark, dense horse-pucky), I came across an attorney’s website from New Haven, Connecticut.

On the links for lawyers page it listed the following article by the National Senior Citizens Law Center as no longer available and it was indeed not there.

Not having any of that, as you might imagine. There is a need here for awareness of impending bullshit, so, on to Mister Peabody’s most excellent Wayback Machine it was. And lo and behold, there it was.

And here, for your enlightenment and reference, is said article.

15 Falsehoods Told By Nursing Facilities

Eric Carlson
National Senior Citizens Law Center
(213) 639-0939, ext. 313
ecarlson at nsclc dot org

INTRODUCTION TO PROBLEM

In 1986 the National Institute of Medicine published a study on nursing facilities. The study found that:

! Residents didn’t receive enough individualized attention; and

! State and federal law focused on mechanical measures of care, and as a result didn’t do nearly enough to protect residents.

In 1987 Congress passed the Nursing Home Reform Law (OBRA ‘87).

The Nursing Home Reform Law applies to every resident of any facility certified to accept payment from Medicare and/or Medicaid.

The Nursing Home Reform Law is located at sections 1395i-3 and 1396r of Title 42 of the United States Code. Sections 1395i-3 and 1396r are essentially identical; section 1395i-3 applies to Medicare-certified facilities; section 1396r applies to Medicaid-certified facilities.

The federal regulations (applicable to facilities that are Medicare-certified and/or Medicaid-certified) are located at section 483 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations. CMS’s Surveyor’s Guidelines to those regulations are found in Appendix PP of CMS’s State Operations Manual.

The Nursing Home Reform Law is based upon the premise that each resident deserves individualized care.

Section 483.25 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations provides that a nursing facility must provide the services that the resident needs “to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.”

Each state has a separate body of law that applies to every nursing facility licensed in the state. On occasions state law applies in situations in which the federal law provides no help.

ADVOCACY BASICS

Too many residents and advocates defer inappropriately to facility employees.

Disputes generally do not involve the interpretation of technical medical information.

Rather, disputes arise when a nursing facility refuses to do something that obviously is in the resident’s best interests.

Problems should be directed up the facility’s chain of command: ÷ nurse aide, nurse, director of nursing, administrator, and corporate manager.

JOHN DOE ENCOUNTERS COMMON NURSING FACILITY FALSEHOODS

Falsehood #1: “We can’t admit John unless John Jr. signs as a ‘Responsible Party.’”

Nursing Home Reform Law prohibits a nursing facility from requiring a third-party guarantee of payment as a condition of admission or continued stay. Section 483.12(d) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

“Responsible Party” language is an attempted evasion of the law.

John Jr. believes that he is becoming a contact person, although he purportedly is “volunteering” to become financially responsible.

For three reasons, “responsible party” provisions are illegal and unenforceable:

1. “Responsible party” provisions are used to require guarantees, in direct violation of federal law.

2. “Responsible party” provisions provide no consideration to either a resident or the “responsible party.”

3. “Responsible party” provisions are deceptive.

The reasoning of this outline is supported by the case of Podolsky v. First Healthcare Corporation, 50 Cal. App. 4th 632, 58 Cal. Rptr. 2d 89 (1996).

Falsehood #2: “The nursing staff will determine the care that John will receive.”

A facility must complete a full assessment of a resident’s condition within 14 days after admission, and at least once every 12 months thereafter. More limited assessments must be done at least quarterly. Section 483.20(b), (c) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Assessments are done with a standardized assessment instrument called the Minimum Data Set (“MDS”).

Assessments are used for development of a comprehensive care plan, which must be prepared initially within seven days after completion of the first full assessment. Every three months, care plans must be reviewed and, if necessary, revised. Section 483.20(d), (k) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

A resident and/or resident’s representative has a right to participate in a care plan conference. Section 483.20(k) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

A care plan must include measurable objectives and timetables. Section 483.20(k) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Too many care plans are perfunctory. Residents and family members should take care plans seriously.

Falsehood #3: “John can’t receive Medicare reimbursement because we have determined that he needs custodial care only.”

Medicare pays for up to 100 days, if resident —

1) Is hospitalized for at least three nights;

2) Needs skilled nursing services or skilled rehabilitation services.

Days 21 through 100 have daily co-payment of $105.

John can force the facility to submit a bill.

Procedure required by the Stipulation and Order in the case of Sarrassat v. Sullivan (N.D.Cal. 1989).

Nursing facility makes initial determination on whether or not to submit bill.

Resident has right to force facility to submit a “demand bill.”

Resident cannot be charged for any amount for which Medicare subsequently may pay.

Falsehood #4: “We can’t give John therapy services because he isn’t making progress.”

This denial may be blamed on medical judgment or Medicare rules.

If the denial is based on medical judgment, the facility should be informed that a facility is responsible for trying to “maintain” a resident’s condition: “a facility must ensure that [a] resident’s abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual’s clinical condition demonstrate that diminution was unavoidable.” Section 483.25(a)(1) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations (emphasis added).

If the denial is blamed on Medicare rules, there are two rebuttal points to be made:

1. Payment source should not affect the care provided. Section 483.12(c)(1) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

2. Medicare reimbursement does not necessarily require “progress.” Resident must need “skilled nursing services” or “skilled rehabilitation services.” Sections 409.31-409.35 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Falsehood #5: “We can’t give John therapy services because his Medicare reimbursement has expired, and Medicaid doesn’t pay for therapy.”

Facilities constantly attempt to tie care to payment source. This way of thinking must be resisted.

This payment-source discrimination is most obvious when a resident transfers from Medicare eligibility to Medicaid eligibility.

There is a gross disparity between the per diem rates for Medicare and Medicaid.

Appropriate therapy should be provided regardless of the form of payment.

1. Services are required.

Federal law requires that resident receive services necessary “to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.” Section 483.25 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

2. Services must not vary by source of payment.

A nursing facility “must establish and maintain identical policies and practices regarding transfer, discharge, and the provision of services required under the State [Medicaid] plan for all individuals regardless of source of payment.” Section 483.12(c)(1) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations (emphasis added).

3. Therapy must be provided under a Medicaid per diem rate.

The Surveyor’s Guidelines to Section 483.45(a) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations provide that therapy services must be provided “even when the services are not specifically enumerated in the State [Medicaid] plan.” (Emphasis added.)

In California, and probably other states, a nursing facility can receive additional Medicaid reimbursement for therapy services provided to a resident. Section 400-18 of the Medi-Cal Long-Term Care Provider Manual (Criteria for NF TAR Authorization (Valdivia v. Coye)).

Falsehood #6: “Because John is no longer eligible for Medicare reimbursement, he must leave his Medicare-certified bed.”

A nursing facility may seek Medicare certification for all or some of the facility’s beds.

Distinct-part certification does not prevent a bed from being used for a resident paying privately or through Medicaid.

A resident has the right to refuse a transfer within a facility if the purpose of the transfer is to move the resident to or from a Medicare-certified bed. Section 483.10(o) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Falsehood #7: “John must be tied into his chair so that he doesn’t wander away from the facility.”

A resident has the right to be free from “any physical or chemical restraint imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident’s medical symptoms.” Section 483.13 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

The term “physical restraint” includes (among other things) vest restraints, hand mitts, seat belts, bed rails, and chairs that are angled to prevent the resident from getting out. Surveyor’s Guideline to section 483.13(a) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Appendix PP to CMS State Operations Manual.

A restraint can be imposed only “to ensure the physical safety of the resident or other residents, and [except in an emergency,] only upon the written order of a physician that specifies the duration and circumstances und er whic h the restraints are to be used.” Sections 1395i-3(c)(1)(A)(ii) and 1396r(c)(1)(A)(ii) of Title 42 of the United States Code.

Although, as listed above, the law recognizes the use of restraints to protect residents, current nursing research increasingly sees the use of restraints as a factor in increasing the number of falls, and/or the severity of injury in the falls that occur.

Falsehood #8: “John has to wake up at 6:00 a.m. because we don’t have enough nurse aides to accommodate individual schedules.”

Nursing Home Reform Law is meant to assure that residents are treated as individual human beings.

! “A facility must care for its residents in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of each resident’s quality of life.” Section 483.15 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

! A resident has the right “to reside and receive services with reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences, except where the health or safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered.” Sections 1395i-3(c)(1)(A)(v)(I) and 1396r(c)(1)(A)(v)(I) of Title 42 of the United States Code (emphasis added).

! “[A] resident has the right to [c]hoose activities, schedules, and health care consistent with his or her interests, assessments, and plans of care.” Section 483.15(b) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Falsehood #9: “We must insert a feeding tube into John because he is not finishing his meals during mealtime.”

A facility must assist a resident in maintaining the resident’s ability to eat. Section 483.25 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Surveyor’s Guidelines mention specific steps that a facility might take, including: prompting the resident to eat; providing therapy to improve swallowing skills; or simply feeding the resident. Surveyor’s Guideline to Section 483.25, Appendix PP to CMS State Operations Manual.

Tube feeding should be done only if absolutely necessary. Section 483.25(g) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Falsehood #10: “John’s children can visit only during visiting hours.”

A limitation on visiting hours conflicts with the idea that a nursing facility should be “home.”

“[I]mmediate family or other relatives” have the right to visit at any time. Section 483.10(j) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

For visits late at night, the Surveyor’s Guidelines to Section 483.10(j) suggest that visits might take place outside of the resident’s room.

Falsehood #11: “We don’t have to readmit John from the hospital because his bedhold period has expired.”

In most states, a resident is entitled to a bed hold of a few days or a week or two. Medicaid generally will pay for the bed hold.

Even if a bed-hold has expired, a nursing facility must readmit a resident eligible for Medicaid reimbursement from the hospital, if the nursing facility has an available bed. Section 483.12(b) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Falsehood #12: “John must pay any amount set by the facility for ‘extra’ charges.”

Amount of charges are limited by the admission agreement, based on standard principles of contract law.

Medicare and Medicaid must be accepted as payment in full. Section 483.10(c) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Falsehood #13: “We have no available space in which residents or family members could meet.”

Residents and resident’s family members have the right to form resident councils and family councils, respectively. If such a group forms, a facility is obligated to provide the group with a private meeting space, and must designate a facility employee as a liaison with the group. Section 483.15 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

A facility must seriously consider, and respond to, all complaints or recommendations made by a resident or family council. Section 483.15 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Falsehood #14: “John must leave the facility because he is a difficult resident.”

Under the Nursing Home Reform Law, there are only six legitimate reasons for eviction:

! The resident has failed to pay.

! The resident no longer needs nursing facility care.

! The nursing facility is going out of business.

! The resident’s needs cannot be met in a nursing facility.

! The resident’s presence in the nursing facility endangers other’s safety.

! The resident’s presence in the nursing facility endangers other’s health.
Section 483.12(a) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Thus “difficulty” is not a justification for eviction.

Nursing facilities exist in order to care for people with physical and mental problems.

Falsehood #15: “John must leave the facility because he is refusing medical treatment.”

A nursing facility resident, like any other individual, has a constitutional and common-law right to refuse medical treatment. Accordingly, an involuntary transfer or discharge cannot be based on a resident’s refusal of treatment.

The federal government has stated that:

! “Refusal of treatment would not constitute grounds for transfer, unless the facility is unable to meet the needs of the resident or protect the health and safety of others.” Surveyor’s Guideline to Section 483.12(a)(2) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Appendix PP to CMS State Operations Manual.

! “A facility may not transfer or discharge a resident for refusing treatment unless the criteria for transfer or discharge are met.” Surveyor’s Guideline to Section 483.10(b)(4) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Appendix PP to CMS State Operations Manual.

 

Gerald Celente on Jay Taylor Radio 26 July 2011
Trends Journalhttp://www.trendsresearch.com/journal
Twitter: http://twitter.com/geraldcelente

Note that this video is an excerpt of just Celente’s part in the two-hour internet show called The Greater Depression. Can a Gold Standard Put America Back on Track? released on the date listed above, which is a link if you care to hear the entire show. The video starts with the audio from the video embedded on the Trends Research Institute’s main page. The actual interview starts at 6:15, so skip to there if you are already familiar with Mr. Celente.

I post a lot of Celente’s work on my three blogs. Why? Well, I like the guy for one. He’s real. He tells it like it actually is. My friend works for him. He has a renowned track record and tons of credibility. Lots of reasons. Probably the most important being that I believe in telling people about what is really going on “behind the scenes,” for scenes are all they are, my dear readers – especially the current debt ceiling “crisis” bullshit. No one really helps me tell people what’s going on better than Gerald Celente does. So that’s basically that.

This show features yet more timely and down-to-earth analysis on the depression that’s starting, (what they’re calling a recession (and even a recovery as I heard on the repulsive mouthpiece called National Public Radio last night!)), some good advice, politics and Gerald’s fine earthy wit.

The Patriot Act – When Truth Becomes TreasonSource
By Susan Lindauer
Former CIA Asset Covering Iraq & Libya
5-23-11

Most Americans believe they understand the dangers of the Patriot Act, which Congress has vowed to extend 4 more years in a vote later this week. Trust me when I say, Americans are not nearly frightened enough.

Ever wonder why the truth about 9/11 never got exposed? Why Americans don’t have a clue about leadership fraud surrounding the War on Terror? Why Americans don’t know if the 9/11 investigation was really successful? Why the Iraqi Peace Option draws a blank? Somebody has known the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden — or his grave – for the past 10 years. But nobody’s talking to the people.

In significant part, that’s because of the Patriot Act — a law that equates free speech with sedition. It’s got a big agenda, with 7,000 pages of Machiavellian code designed to interrupt individual questioning of government policy. In this brave new world, free speech under the Bill of Rights effectively has been declared a threat to government controls for maintaining stability. And the Patriot Act has become the premiere weapon to attack whistle blowers and dissidents who challenge the comfort of political leaders hiding inconvenient truths from the public. It’s all the rage on Capitol Hill, as leaders strive to score TV ratings, while demogauging their “outstanding leadership performance” on everything from national security to environmental policy.

Truth Has Become Treason

But wait — Congress assures us the Patriot Act only targets foreigners, who come to our shores seeking to destroy our way of life through violent, criminal acts. Good, law abiding Americans have nothing to fear. The Patriot Act restricts its powers of “roving wiretaps” and warrantless searches to international communications among “bad guys.” Congress has sworn, with hand on heart, it’s only purpose is breaking down terrorist cells and hunting out “lone wolf” mad men.

That’s what they told you, right? And you believed them? You trust the government. Well, that was your first mistake. With regards to the Patriot Act, it’s a fatal one. Would the government lie to you? You betcha! And they have.

The Patriot Act reaches far beyond terrorism prevention. In my home state of Maryland, State Police invoked the Patriot Act to run surveillance on the Chesapeake Climate Action Network dedicated to wind power, recycling and protection of the Chesapeake Bay. They infiltrated the DC Anti War Network, suggesting the group might be a front for “white supremacists,” and Amnesty International, claiming to investigate “civil rights abuses.” Opponents of the death penalty also got targeted (in case they got violent).

Bottom line: truth tellers who give Americans too much insight on any number of issues are vulnerable to a vast arsenal of judicial weapons typically associated with China or Myanmar. In the Patriot Act, the government has created a powerful tool to hunt out free thinking on the left or right. It doesn’t discriminate. Anyone who opposes government policy is at risk.

How do I know all this? Because I was the second non-Arab American ever indicted on the Patriot Act. My arrest defied all expectations about the law. I was no terrorist plotting to explode the Washington Monument. Quite the opposite, I had worked in anti-terrorism for almost a decade, covering Iraq and Libya, Yemen, Egypt and Malaysia at the United Nations. At the instruction of my CIA handler, I had delivered advance warnings about the 9/11 attack to the private staff of Attorney General John Ashcroft and the Office of Counter-Terrorism in August, 2001. FBI wire taps prove that I carried details of a comprehensive peace framework with Iraq up and down the hallowed corridors of Capitol Hill for months before the invasion, arguing that War was totally unnecessary.

I delivered those papers to Democrats and Republicans alike; to my own second cousin, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card; and to Secretary of State Colin Powell, who lived next door to my CIA handler. Gratis of the Patriot Act, we had the manila envelope and my hand written notes to Secretary Powell, dated a week before his infamous speech at the United Nations. My papers argued that no WMDs would be found inside Iraq, and that the peace framework could achieve all U.S. objectives without firing a shot.

In short, I was an Asset who loudly opposed War with Iraq, and made every effort to correct the mistakes in assumptions on Capitol Hill.

Then I did the unthinkable. I phoned the offices of Senator Trent Lott and Senator John McCain, requesting to testify before a brand new, blue ribbon Commission investigating Pre-War Intelligence. Proud and confident of my efforts, I had no idea Congress was planning to blame “bad intelligence” for the unpopular War.

Over night I became Public Enemy Number One on Capitol Hill

Thirty days later I awoke to hear FBI agents pounding on my door. My nightmare on the Patriot Act lasted 5 years — Four years after my arrest, the Court granted me one morning of evidentiary testimony by two supremely credible witnesses. Parke Godfrey verified my 9/11 warnings under oath. Otherwise, I never got my day in Court.

The Patriot Act’s Arsenal To Stop Free Speech

If you care about America and the traditions of freedom, whether you’re progressive or conservative, you should be angry about this law.

First come the warrantless searches and FBI tracking surveillance. My work in anti-terrorism gave me no protection. I got my first warrantless search after meeting an undercover FBI agent to discuss my support for free elections in Iraq and my opposition to torture and sexual humiliation of Iraqi detainees. (Sorry guys, body wires don’t lie.)

If truth tellers don’t get the message to shut their mouths, the Justice Department ratchets up the pressure. Defendants face secret charges, secret evidence and secret grand jury testimony. Throughout five years of indictment, my attorneys and I never got to read a single FBI interview or grand jury statement. Under the Patriot Act, the whistleblower / defendant has no right to know who has accused him or her of what criminal activities, or the dates of the alleged offenses, or what laws got broken.

Of course, I was able to piece together my activities. I knew that “sometime in October, 2001” an Iraqi diplomat gave me the English translation of a book on depleted uranium, which showed how cancer rates and birth defects had spiked in Iraqi children.

And I was quite certain that on October 14, 1999, an Iraqi diplomat asked me how to channel major financial contributions to the Presidential Campaign of George Bush and Dick Cheney. The Justice Department got the date from me, since I reported my conversation immediately to my Defense Intelligence handler, Paul Hoven.

It’s unlikely the grand jury knew that, since the Justice Department has the prerogative to keep a grand jury in the dark. In this brave new world, a grand jury can be compelled to consider indictments carrying 10 years or more in prison, without the right to review evidence, or otherwise determine whether an individual’s actions rise to the level of criminal activity at all.

That’s just the beginning. Once Congress scores an indictment against a political opponent, the Justice Department can force Defense attorneys to undergo protracted security clearances, while the whistle blower cum defendant waits in prison — usually in solitary confinement or the SHU. After the security clearance, prosecutors have an ironclad right to bar attorneys from communicating communications from the prosecution to the defendant, on threat of disbarment, stiff fines or prison sentence.

Scared yet? Once you get to trial, the situation gets much worse. The Patriot Act declares that a prosecutor has no obligation to show evidence of criminal activity to a jury at all. And the Defense can be denied the right to argue a rebuttal to those secret charges, because it requires speculation that might mislead the jury – or might expose issues that the government considers, well, secret. After all that a Judge can instruct a jury that the prosecution regards the secret evidence as sufficient to merit conviction on the secret charges. The Jury can be barred from considering the lack of evidence in weighing whether to convict.

Think I’m exaggerating? You would be wrong. That’s what happened to me. All of it – with one major glitch. All of this presumes the whistle blower’s lucky enough to get a trial. I was denied mine, though I fought vigorously for my rights. Instead, citing the Patriot Act, I got thrown in prison on a Texas military base without so much as a hearing – and threatened with indefinite detention and forcible drugging, to boot.

Americans are not nearly afraid enough.

Neither is Congress. As of this week, members of Congress should be very afraid. Anyone who votes to extend the Patriot Act should expect to pack their bags in 2012. They will be targeted for defeat. Above all, the words “freedom” and “Constitution” will never appear in their campaigns without suffering extreme public scorn – never, ever again.

___________

Susan Lindauer is the author of Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq, which reveals details of her CIA team’s 9/11 warnings and a comprehensive peace option with Iraq.

###

Gerald Celente, appearing on the Alex Jones show, discussing the most important of the world’s current happenings, the current state of affairs in general and offering some of his rather sage advice on how we all can successfully make it out the other side in spite of the Powers That Be’s best efforts to keep us in our current status as their slaves.

It really is a good idea to pay attention to Celente. He is not wrong. And the message is, when you sit back and think about what he said, kind of spiritual. Surprising? I don’t think so, but hey, he’s one of us… and that’s a good thing.

Part 1

Part 2

For a long time now, a really long time, I have been repeatedly appalled and driven to revulsion by the increasingly barbarous activities engaged in by the people who govern this country.

Although, being a conspiracy guy, I never really believed it could possibly be true, for a rather brief period I thought that Obummer might give a couple of our freedoms back, just for show, but as expected, this never happened. In fact, things are much, much worse – likely making Dubya, CondoSleezza and The Dick smile their nights away. The illegal torture program that the article deals with has been both extended and expanded. Just like the SS, just like the SS.

So in the spirit of fighting back, I offer this piece of insight from Truthout. This is the commercial for this article. Read it (the article. d’oh!) for a sobering history lesson in something that is, in one way or another, affecting us all.

Here ya go…

Leopold, Kaye | EXCLUSIVE: CIA Psychologist’s Notes Reveal True Purpose Behind Bush’s Torture Program

Read the Article

It’s been nine years since the Bush administration implemented its highly-classified torture program, where government interrogators subjected “war on terror” detainees held at CIA prisons and at Guantanamo to brutal techniques in an effort, the public was told, to thwart pending terrorist attacks against the United States and its interests abroad.

While President Obama and Congressional lawmakers “look forward” and have failed to hold accountable those individuals who violated international and domestic human rights laws, new revelations continue to surface showing the extent of the previous administration’s war crimes and the lies upon which they were based.

Indeed, as Jason Leopold and Jeffrey Kaye report in this in-depth investigative report, the handwritten notes, obtained exclusively by Truthout, that were drafted by Dr. John Bruce Jessen, the psychologist who was under contract to the CIA and credited as being one of the architects of the so-called “enhanced interrogation” program, show that torture was used to “exploit” detainees and to get them to “collaborate” with government authorities.

The documents stand as the first pieces of hard evidence to surface that further explain the psychological aspects of Bush’s torture program and the rationale for subjecting detainees to so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques.” Jessen’s notes were provided to Truthout by retired Air Force Capt. Michael Kearns, a decorated veteran who previously held high-ranking positions within the Department of Defense, and is speaking publicly for the first time. Kearns, who worked closely with Jessen in developing a survival training program for military personnel that the torture program was based upon, said Jessen’s “duplicitous act is appalling to me and shall haunt me for the rest of my life.”

Supplementing this groundbreaking report is an exclusive, on-camera interview with Captain Kearns conducted by Jason Leopold. Truthout is also providing our readers with copies of Jessen’s notes that can be downloaded from the article page.
———-
Support Truthout with a tax-deductible donation by clicking here.

The Newspaper Guild - Communications Workers of America
Truthout is a proud member of the Newspaper Guild/CWA, Local 36047